Skip to main content

Full text of "enders-game"

See other formats

Ender’s Game 

D: 20171121134319+08’00’ 

Putative Observations — Foils 

Consider that the Formics might be a foil for Humanity. Just as hive-queens marshall their drones, our institutions 
engender and limit our behavior. Card seems to consider this directly: “I understood at levels deeper than speech, 
how a great military leader imposes his will on his enemy, and makes his own army a willing extension of himself .” 1 

Consider that Peter might be a foil for Ender. When Graff states “We need a Napoleon or Alexander.” it is Peter 
who looks like Alexander and later becomes Hegemon, just as Alexander was crowned Hegemon after uniting 
the Hellenic city-states . 2 Throughout, Ender typically deploys tactics which break the rules of the game, while 
Peter just does not play the games handed him. 

Also, consider that Peter may have only been acting like a psychopath. Given the well-known defeat of the 
Second Invasion, Peter does not need to enter the IF - i.e. since other people have demonstrated the ability to 
clean up the Formics, let them. He fakes the sadism which allows him to first avoid IF conscription and then 
later leverage Val. However, when the IF asks for a Third from the Wiggins, he realizes that he overestimated 
Humanity, and that his life will be difficult because he needs to adequately prepare 3 Ender while also maintaining 
the act. It’s only when the cameras are off - no monitoring - that Peter can drop his act and tell Ender that he 
is his brother and that he loves him . 4 

Putative Observations — Communication 

Contact is itself a form of communication. What does it say of a species that instead of observing at a remove, 
immediately colonizes whole worlds? Similarly, what does it say of a person that their first move is to bully or 
physically harm someone? 

Implications — ius in bello 

If someone’s default way of greeting a stranger is to initiate a strike, then Ender sums his personal cost of all 
future consequences of not dissuading the antagonist. For him, this large cost justifies all retaliations. 

However, Ender fails to discriminate between future antagonists: the ‘good’ one that abandons the first-strike 
mentality, and the ‘evil’ one that continues it. When Ender discovers that he has killed, he is torn and seems 
unable to determine whether the collateral damage was acceptable or not. Yet he continues with his calculus - 
instead of refusing to play IF’s wargame after killing Bonzo, he seeks to compel them to end it. 

To summarize, in Ender’s personal calculus of ius in bello , the antagonist’s willingness to strike first justifies any 
and all retaliations, and Ender is not required to weigh the possible futures. 

Applying this calculus to species, discrimination of combatant and non-combatant is no longer apposite due to 
Formic-Human foil equivalence - i.e. we are complied hive-members of the world’s institutions. It matters not 
that we disagree, when we allow a game to be played that has an outcome of ‘terraform worlds with abandon’. 

As for proportionality, Ender’s summation-calculus can also be applied retrospectively the colonizing species 
has done this countless times before and that the only consequences have been those which accrued to the other 
injured parties. For example, assume that the hive-queen was not lying when she said ”We thought we were the 
only thinking beings in the universe, until we met you, but never did we dream that thought could arise from 
the lonely animals who cannot dream each other’s dreams.” 

Since it took a reginacide for the Formics to even take notice of Humans, how many other intelligent species did 
they plow under without realizing it? Given Ender’s calculus, Xenocide then becomes a just response. 

4 Ender’s Game and Philosophy, edited by Kevin S. Decker, published in 2013 as ISBN 978-1-118-38657-6; quote referenced in the 
section by Jeffery L. Nicholas - Of Gods and Buggers 

2 Alexander then goes on to defeat the Persians at Issus and Gaugamela, with the latter resembling the Second Invasion: Darius’ 
command & control seems hive-queen-like, and Alexander’s decapitative strike seems Rackham-like. 


Much as Bean surreptitiously helps Ender later on. 

’’They used to take pleasure in building things that would stand up even when a lot of the obvious supports had been removed. 
Peter, in turn, liked to remove a block here or there, so the structure would be fragile enough that the next person to touch it would 
knock it down. Peter was an ass, but he did provide some focus to their childhood.” 

4 Why does Peter apologize that night before Ender is inducted into Battle School? Is it for the past, or for the future where most of 
the outcomes for Ender are not good? 

As Ender does not appreciate the guilt implicit in the hive-queen’s statement, consider that by playing the 
Giant’s Drink game, Ender’s mind has been wormed and is now slaved to the hive-queen. “I’ve spent my life as 
someone’s pawn.” 

Implications — ius post bellum 

While Ender is an exemplary tactician who has been subverted by playing the wrong games, Peter is an exemplary 
strategist who becomes a modern Bismarck by avoiding the traps that games can be. This difference in outcomes 
belies their differences in post-conflict expectations. 

Throughout, Ender never contemplates a pax inter ‘pares ’. For example, what paths were there for Bonzo after 
Ender had humiliated him? Either Bonzo would resort to violence, or some other means of getting even. While 
Ender broke other rules in the game, the one rule he never broke was that there can only be one child at the top 
of the pyramid of Graff’s kids. 

Clausewitz’s ’’War is politics by other means” is a constant admonishment to keep the future in mind when 
waging war i.e. violence should always serve a greater political purpose, and we should always be preparing for 
a future that we can live with. 

Given this, the Formics have a real political 5 problem: a) their rampant colonial activity nearly killed off Hu¬ 
manity, and b) as described, the Formics have the ceaseless rapacity of the alien from Alien combined with the 
psionic powers of a Stephen King fright-fest. 

Accidentally or not, the Formics trigger Humans’ ’Burn with Fire!’ response. Any post bellum pax that both 
species survive to enjoy requires that the initially injured party have at least power parity so as to dissuade 
another first strike. Good luck establishing that parity with psionic faster-than-light weapons on the loose. 

Implications - Culture —> War 

That said, Human culture could also be described as a psionic weapon - e.g. shared military schooling helps 
officers coordinate faster. And some cultures have exercised their first-strike capabilities - e.g. United States’ 
‘Manifest Destiny’, Stalinist Socialism, Spanish Inquisition’s forced conversions, Islam’s wars of expansion, sev¬ 
eral religions’ requirement of conversion before marriage. By Ender’s calculus, each of these cultures could be 
destroyed for its past sins, while Peter would rather constantly prune them to preclude any further aggression. 

Without Peters, we get Enders. 

de memoriae 

What I enjoyed most about Ender’s Game was that it mirrored childhood i.e. your long-term memory starts 
working, and while you don’t understand most of what’s happening, you still remember it. Later on in life you 
can look back, and only then do you understand. 


What does queen warfare look like? Or does the book depict it - with one queen using Ender? - since Formics have no written 
history, there is nothing to corroborate the queen’s story.